Monday, October 24, 2005

Sorry, Rosa

[According to a Harvard study], During the past 25 years, "there has been no significant leadership towards the goal of creating a successfully integrated society builty on integrated schools and neighborhoods." The last constructive act by Congress was the 1972 enactment of a federal program to provide financial aid to districts undertaking efforts at desegregation, which, however, was "repealed by the Reagan administration in 1981." The Supreme Court "began limiting desegregation in key ways in 1974"--and actively dismantling existing integration programs in 1991.

"Desegregation did not fail. In spite of a very brief period of serious enforcement..., the desegregation era was a period in which minority high school graduates increased sharply and the racial test score gaps narrowed substantially until they began to widen again in the 1990s...In the two largest educationaa\l inovations of the past two decades--standards-based reform and school choice--the issue of racial segregation and its consequences has been ignored."


The study is from Gary Orfield and his colleagues. The book is Jonathan Kozol's current The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. I urge, in the strongest terms I possibly can, everyone who cares about the country to read Kozol's beautiful and sad descriptions of what's going on in schools that are 85, 95, and even 99.8 percent African-American and Hispanic. It is devastating. It (yes) shames me as an American. It motivates me.

Rosa Parks died as I was reading Kozol's book, gearing up for the sermon and talk he'll give at my church next week. I now will always associate Kozol's pleas with her death.

Mrs. Parks, thank you for your fight. On behalf of those who love what you and America stand for, I'm sorry we've let you down. I hope we earn back your victory and your legacy, but I currently have no reason to be optimistic.

4 comments:

Joe said...

I'll try to read Kozol's book, because I'm only generally familiar with his work. And I don't doubt that we have educational inequality which correlates with race.

However, I'm not completely comfortable with "the goal of creating a successfully integrated society built on integrated schools and neighborhoods"... largely because I think it's a poorly-thought-out plan. There's no reason I can see to believe that having integrated schools will lead to integrating the neighborhoods around them.

(Although one could speculate that an integrated school would tend to help keep a neighborhood integrated. I'm not sure I buy it, but I'd listen.)

In essence, it sounds to me like the net effect is to separate the school from the immediate neighborhood. As a private school boy my whole life, I don't have any problem with that. But to me, it sounds like geography is the sticky wicket you're trying to solve. This almost sounds like a claim that a purely geographical system can't possibly work equally, and I think that's a big leap.

Again: I know we have major inequalities in our educational system, which have a hell of a lot to do with class and race. I'm open to discuss any proposal which irons them out. But I think the primary goal of the school system is to educate, and we let any other goal take the spotlight at our own peril.

TeacherRefPoet said...

Joe,

Don't want to say too much until you've read the book, but I'm not giving too much away by saying giving you a good chunk of Kozol's thesis.

More or less, he's arguing that we've given up on Brown vs. Board of Education. Separate schooling by race is inherently unequal. In our country, we have separate schooling by economic class, which means we have separate schooling by class, which means our social/racial injustices are compounded, entrenched, and fossilized. We can't avoid that without integration.

I don't see Kozol advocating forced integration of neighborhoods, if that's what concerns you. But you'll know that soon enough.

TeacherRefPoet said...

One more thing:

Under our current economic realities, a purely geographical division of schools cannot be just or fair. And we can't break out of those injustices without making equitable education.

Joe said...

Well, like I said, I'm not attached to geography-based schooling. I think eliminating it is a hard sell to a lot of other people, but if it gets everyone better education, I say go for it.